What are the chances of seeing an Orizaba Silkmoth in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Orizaba Silkmoth sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 57th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orizaba Silkmoth in Arenal Volcano National Park?
May and July
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Orizaba Silkmoth in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August and October–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Orizaba Silkmoth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orizaba Silkmoth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see an Orizaba Silkmoth?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Orizaba Silkmoth sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Orizaba Silkmoth live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Saturniidae
The closest relatives of the Orizaba Silkmoth that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Saturniidae, Emperor and Giant Silk Moths) are Pseudodirphia menander (about 10%), Therinia transversaria (about 10%) and Automeris postalbida (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orizaba Silkmoth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orizaba Silkmoth is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.