What are the chances of seeing a Black-winged Lapwing in Arusha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Lapwing sighting in Arusha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 352nd most-seen of the 373 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-winged Lapwing in Arusha National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-winged Lapwing in Arusha National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-winged Lapwing?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-winged Lapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arusha National Park the best place to see a Black-winged Lapwing?
10th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Black-winged Lapwing sightings, Arusha National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Masai Mara National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%), Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 10%) and Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-winged Lapwing live in Arusha National Park?
Same genus: Vanellus
The closest relatives of the Black-winged Lapwing that you can see in Arusha National Park (genus Vanellus, Lapwings) are Blacksmith Lapwing (about 60%), Spur-winged Lapwing (about 20%) and Crowned Lapwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-winged Lapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-winged Lapwing is recorded against all the birds logged in Arusha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.