What are the chances of seeing a Long-billed Curlew in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Curlew sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-billed Curlew in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Curlew in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Long-billed Curlew?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-billed Curlew sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a Long-billed Curlew?
6th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Long-billed Curlew sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 60%), El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%) and Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Long-billed Curlew live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same genus: Numenius
The closest relatives of the Long-billed Curlew that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (genus Numenius, Curlews) are Hudsonian Whimbrel (about 30%) and Whimbrel (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-billed Curlew sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-billed Curlew is recorded against all the birds logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.