What are the chances of seeing a Marbled Godwit in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Godwit sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 178 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 50th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Marbled Godwit in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
October and December–March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Godwit in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Marbled Godwit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Marbled Godwit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a Marbled Godwit?
3rd of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Marbled Godwit sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 50%) and Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Marbled Godwit live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Marbled Godwit that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Spotted Sandpiper (about 50%), Willet (about 30%) and Hudsonian Whimbrel (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Marbled Godwit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Marbled Godwit is recorded against all the birds logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (178 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.