What are the chances of seeing a Purple Hairstreak in Bavarian Forest National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Purple Hairstreak sighting in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 822nd most-seen of the 1115 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Purple Hairstreak in Bavarian Forest National Park?
February, June and August–September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Purple Hairstreak in Bavarian Forest National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, July and October–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Purple Hairstreak?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Purple Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bavarian Forest National Park the best place to see a Purple Hairstreak?
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Purple Hairstreak sightings, Bavarian Forest National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%), Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%) and Pyrénées National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Purple Hairstreak live in Bavarian Forest National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Purple Hairstreak that you can see in Bavarian Forest National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Common Blue (about 30%), Small Copper (about 20%) and Holly Blue (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Purple Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Purple Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Bavarian Forest National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.