What are the chances of seeing a Variegated Meadowhawk in Big Bend National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Meadowhawk sighting in Big Bend National Park on a given day, based on 62 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 329 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Variegated Meadowhawk in Big Bend National Park?
October and November
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Variegated Meadowhawk in Big Bend National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and June–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Variegated Meadowhawk?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Variegated Meadowhawk sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Big Bend National Park the best place to see a Variegated Meadowhawk?
3rd of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Variegated Meadowhawk sightings, Big Bend National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Death Valley National Park (United States, about 30%) and Joshua Tree National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Variegated Meadowhawk live in Big Bend National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Variegated Meadowhawk that you can see in Big Bend National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Black Setwing (about 20%), Flame Skimmer (about 20%) and Roseate Skimmer (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Variegated Meadowhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Variegated Meadowhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Big Bend National Park (62 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.