What are the chances of seeing a Banksia Boring Moth in Blue Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Banksia Boring Moth sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 611th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Banksia Boring Moth in Blue Mountains National Park?
February–April and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Banksia Boring Moth in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–September and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Banksia Boring Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Banksia Boring Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Banksia Boring Moth?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Banksia Boring Moth sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Banksia Boring Moth live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Tortricidae
The closest relatives of the Banksia Boring Moth that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Tortricidae, Tortricid Leafroller Moths) are Acroceuthes metaxanthana (about 10%), Cotton Tipworm Moth (about 10%) and Orange Fruit Borer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Banksia Boring Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Banksia Boring Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.