What are the chances of seeing an Isla Bonita Robber Frog in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Isla Bonita Robber Frog sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 46 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Isla Bonita Robber Frog in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Isla Bonita Robber Frog in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April–May and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Isla Bonita Robber Frog?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Isla Bonita Robber Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see an Isla Bonita Robber Frog?
2nd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Isla Bonita Robber Frog sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Isla Bonita Robber Frog live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same genus: Craugastor
The closest relatives of the Isla Bonita Robber Frog that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Craugastor, Northern Rainfrogs) are Atlantic Broad-headed Litter Frog (about 40%), Fitzinger's Robber Frog (about 40%) and Bransford's Litter Frog (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Isla Bonita Robber Frog sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Isla Bonita Robber Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.