What are the chances of seeing a Tiger Crescent in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Crescent sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 290th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tiger Crescent in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
January to March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Crescent in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Tiger Crescent?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tiger Crescent sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Tiger Crescent?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Tiger Crescent sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 5th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%), Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Tiger Crescent live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same genus: Eresia
The closest relatives of the Tiger Crescent that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Eresia) are Variable Crescent (about 10%) and Clio Crescent (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tiger Crescent sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tiger Crescent is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.