What are the chances of seeing a Flame Shoulder Moth in Cairngorms National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Flame Shoulder Moth sighting in Cairngorms National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 189th most-seen of the 300 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Flame Shoulder Moth in Cairngorms National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Flame Shoulder Moth in Cairngorms National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Flame Shoulder Moth?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Flame Shoulder Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Cairngorms National Park the best place to see a Flame Shoulder Moth?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Flame Shoulder Moth sightings, Cairngorms National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Snowdonia National Park (United Kingdom, about 20%), Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%) and Pyrénées National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Flame Shoulder Moth live in Cairngorms National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Flame Shoulder Moth that you can see in Cairngorms National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Large Yellow Underwing (about 20%), Antler Moth (about 20%) and Dark Arches (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Flame Shoulder Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Flame Shoulder Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Cairngorms National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.