What are the chances of seeing a Juditha caucana in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Juditha caucana sighting in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 62nd most-seen of the 75 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Juditha caucana in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Juditha caucana in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. That is one of Calakmul Biosphere Reserve's wettest months, with about 130 mm of rain against 15 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Juditha caucana?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Juditha caucana sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Calakmul Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Juditha caucana?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Juditha caucana sightings, Calakmul Biosphere Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Juditha caucana live in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Juditha caucana that you can see in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Many-Banded Daggerwing (about 30%), Common Morpho (about 20%) and Dark Kite-Swallowtail (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Juditha caucana sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Juditha caucana is recorded against all the insects logged in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.