What are the chances of seeing a Common Mapwing in Cat Tien National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Mapwing sighting in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 125 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Mapwing in Cat Tien National Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Mapwing in Cat Tien National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–February, the lowest months. That is one of Cat Tien National Park's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 490 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Common Mapwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Mapwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cat Tien National Park the best place to see a Common Mapwing?
8th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Common Mapwing sightings, Cat Tien National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 50%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%) and Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Mapwing live in Cat Tien National Park?
Same genus: Cyrestis
The closest relatives of the Common Mapwing that you can see in Cat Tien National Park (genus Cyrestis, map butterflies) are Marbled Map (about 30%) and Straight-Line Mapwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Mapwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Mapwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cat Tien National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.