What are the chances of seeing a Black-Veined White in Cévennes National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Veined White sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 151 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-Veined White in Cévennes National Park?
June
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Veined White in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-Veined White?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-Veined White sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Black-Veined White?
6th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Black-Veined White sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 6th at about 30%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 40%), Ecrins National Park (France, about 30%) and Vanoise National Park (France, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-Veined White live in Cévennes National Park?
Same family: Pieridae
The closest relatives of the Black-Veined White that you can see in Cévennes National Park (family Pieridae, Whites, Yellows, and Sulphurs) are Cleopatra Butterfly (about 30%), Green-Veined White (about 20%) and Clouded Yellow (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-Veined White sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-Veined White is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (151 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.