Camponotus cruentatus
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monfragüe National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 2 | Sierra Nevada National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 3 | Sierra de Guadarrama National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 4 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 5 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and December–January, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 30%), Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 30%) and Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Same genus: Camponotus
The closest relatives of the Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant that you can see in Cévennes National Park (genus Camponotus, Carpenter Ants, Typical Sugar Ants and Allies) are Hairy Carpenter Ant (about 20%), Camponotus lateralis (about 10%) and Ethiop Carpenter Ant (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blood-Spotted Sugar Ant is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
