What are the chances of seeing a Red-Necked Footman in Cévennes National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Necked Footman sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 896th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-Necked Footman in Cévennes National Park?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Necked Footman in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-Necked Footman?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-Necked Footman sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Red-Necked Footman?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Red-Necked Footman sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 10%), Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 10%) and Cairngorms National Park (United Kingdom, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-Necked Footman live in Cévennes National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Red-Necked Footman that you can see in Cévennes National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cream-Spot Tiger (about 20%), Spongy Moth (about 20%) and Four-Spotted Footman (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-Necked Footman sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-Necked Footman is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.