What are the chances of seeing a Long-billed Curlew in Channel Islands National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Curlew sighting in Channel Islands National Park on a given day, based on 608 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 87th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-billed Curlew in Channel Islands National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Long-billed Curlew in Channel Islands National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January to May, the lowest months. That is one of Channel Islands National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 60 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Long-billed Curlew?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-billed Curlew sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Channel Islands National Park the best place to see a Long-billed Curlew?
3rd of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Long-billed Curlew sightings, Channel Islands National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 60%) and El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Long-billed Curlew live in Channel Islands National Park?
Same genus: Numenius
The closest relatives of the Long-billed Curlew that you can see in Channel Islands National Park (genus Numenius, Curlews) are Hudsonian Whimbrel (about 20%) and Whimbrel (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-billed Curlew sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-billed Curlew is recorded against all the birds logged in Channel Islands National Park (608 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.