What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Tattler in Channel Islands National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler sighting in Channel Islands National Park on a given day, based on 361 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 111th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Tattler in Channel Islands National Park?
May, August, October and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler in Channel Islands National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, June–July, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Tattler?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Tattler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Channel Islands National Park the best place to see a Wandering Tattler?
6th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Wandering Tattler sightings, Channel Islands National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Isla del Coco National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Galápagos Islands (Ecuador, about 40%) and Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Tattler live in Channel Islands National Park?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Wandering Tattler that you can see in Channel Islands National Park (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Willet (about 30%) and Greater Yellowlegs (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Tattler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Tattler is recorded against all the birds logged in Channel Islands National Park (361 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.