What are the chances of seeing a Pectoral Sparrow in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pectoral Sparrow sighting in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 197th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pectoral Sparrow in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
April–June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pectoral Sparrow in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pectoral Sparrow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pectoral Sparrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chapada Diamantina National Park the best place to see a Pectoral Sparrow?
5th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Pectoral Sparrow sightings, Chapada Diamantina National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%), Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%) and Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pectoral Sparrow live in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Same family: Passerellidae
The closest relatives of the Pectoral Sparrow that you can see in Chapada Diamantina National Park (family Passerellidae, New World Sparrows) are Rufous-collared Sparrow (about 60%) and Grassland Sparrow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pectoral Sparrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pectoral Sparrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Chapada Diamantina National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.