What are the chances of seeing a Black-cheeked Warbler in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-cheeked Warbler sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 118 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 142nd most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-cheeked Warbler in Chirripó National Park?
March–May, July–September and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-cheeked Warbler in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-cheeked Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-cheeked Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Black-cheeked Warbler?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-cheeked Warbler sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 40%), Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Irazú Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-cheeked Warbler live in Chirripó National Park?
Same genus: Basileuterus
The closest relatives of the Black-cheeked Warbler that you can see in Chirripó National Park (genus Basileuterus) are Golden-crowned Warbler (about 10%) and Costa Rican Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-cheeked Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-cheeked Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (118 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.