Aetalion reticulatum
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 2 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Tijuca National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | João Pessoa | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Goiânia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Recife | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 4 | Montevideo | 🇺🇾 Uruguay | |
| 5 | Maceió | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 6 | São Paulo | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 7 | Brasilia | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 8 | San José | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 9 | Campinas | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 10 | Curitiba | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Aetalion reticulatum sighting in João Pessoa on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 30th most-seen of the 56 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Aetalion reticulatum in João Pessoa on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June and October–January, the lowest months.
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Aetalion reticulatum sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 14 cities where we can rate Aetalion reticulatum sightings, João Pessoa has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Goiânia (Brazil, about 10%) and Recife (Brazil, about 10%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Aetalion reticulatum that you can see in João Pessoa (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Enchenopa squamigera (about 20%), Arilus carinatus (about 20%) and Erechtia gibbosa (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Aetalion reticulatum is recorded against all the insects logged in João Pessoa (8 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
