What are the chances of seeing a Magnificent Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Magnificent Swallowtail sighting in San Luis Potosí on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 19th most-seen of the 91 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Magnificent Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí?
June and August–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Magnificent Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí on a given day, against under 5% in January, the lowest month. Those are among San Luis Potosí's wettest months, with about 75 mm of rain a month against 5 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see a Magnificent Swallowtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Magnificent Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is San Luis Potosí the best place to see a Magnificent Swallowtail?
5th of 7
Of the 7 cities where we can rate Magnificent Swallowtail sightings, San Luis Potosí ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Toluca (México, about 30%), Puebla (México, about 30%) and Mexico City (México, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Magnificent Swallowtail live in San Luis Potosí?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Magnificent Swallowtail that you can see in San Luis Potosí (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Two-Tailed Swallowtail (about 20%), Western Giant Swallowtail (about 10%) and Black Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Magnificent Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Magnificent Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in San Luis Potosí (20 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.