What are the chances of seeing a Pipevine Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pipevine Swallowtail sighting in San Luis Potosí on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 15th most-seen of the 91 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pipevine Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pipevine Swallowtail in San Luis Potosí on a given day, against under 5% in July, the lowest month. That is one of San Luis Potosí's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 110 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pipevine Swallowtail?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pipevine Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is San Luis Potosí the best place to see a Pipevine Swallowtail?
6th of 24
Of the 24 cities where we can rate Pipevine Swallowtail sightings, San Luis Potosí ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Sacramento (United States, about 30%), San Antonio (United States, about 30%) and Austin (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Pipevine Swallowtail live in San Luis Potosí?
Same family: Papilionidae
The closest relatives of the Pipevine Swallowtail that you can see in San Luis Potosí (family Papilionidae, Swallowtails and Parnassians) are Two-Tailed Swallowtail (about 20%), Western Giant Swallowtail (about 10%) and Magnificent Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pipevine Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pipevine Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in San Luis Potosí (23 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.