Labidus praedator
Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at São Paulo

In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%

5 Verified sightings at São Paulo
54 In all 4 parks From 2019 to 2026
January Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Iguazú National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
~10%
2 Iguaçu National Park 🇧🇷 Brazil
~10%
3 Soberanía National Park 🇵🇦 Panama
~10%
4 Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve 🇨🇷 Costa Rica
~10%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 São Paulo 🇧🇷 Brazil
<5%

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Labidus praedator in São Paulo?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Labidus praedator sighting in São Paulo on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 751st most-seen of the 832 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Labidus praedator in São Paulo?

Any time of year

In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Labidus praedator in São Paulo on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.

What time of day is best to see a Labidus praedator?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Labidus praedator sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Where else can you see a Labidus praedator?

Only São Paulo, in our data

São Paulo is the only city on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Labidus praedator sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Where does the Labidus praedator sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Labidus praedator is recorded against all the insects logged in São Paulo (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to São Paulo