What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Tattler in Coiba National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler sighting in Coiba National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 118 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Tattler in Coiba National Park?
March and April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler in Coiba National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August and November–February, the lowest months. Those are among Coiba National Park's driest months, with about 140 mm of rain a month against 590 mm in November. May and October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Tattler?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Tattler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Coiba National Park the best place to see a Wandering Tattler?
5th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Wandering Tattler sightings, Coiba National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Isla del Coco National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Galápagos Islands (Ecuador, about 40%) and Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Tattler live in Coiba National Park?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Wandering Tattler that you can see in Coiba National Park (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Willet (about 20%) and Greater Yellowlegs (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Tattler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Tattler is recorded against all the birds logged in Coiba National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.