What are the chances of seeing a Crimson Marsh Glider in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Crimson Marsh Glider sighting in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 126 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crimson Marsh Glider in Cuc Phuong National Park?
February and May–June
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Crimson Marsh Glider in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and October–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Crimson Marsh Glider?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crimson Marsh Glider sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuc Phuong National Park the best place to see a Crimson Marsh Glider?
8th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Crimson Marsh Glider sightings, Cuc Phuong National Park ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 40%), Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 40%) and Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Crimson Marsh Glider live in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Crimson Marsh Glider that you can see in Cuc Phuong National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Slender Skimmer (about 40%), Crimson-Tailed Marsh Hawk (about 30%) and Common Picture Wing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crimson Marsh Glider sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crimson Marsh Glider is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuc Phuong National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.