What are the chances of seeing a Tropical Fritillary in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Fritillary sighting in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 51st most-seen of the 126 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tropical Fritillary in Cuc Phuong National Park?
November
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Tropical Fritillary in Cuc Phuong National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, July–August, October and December–February, the lowest months. That is one of Cuc Phuong National Park's driest months, with about 70 mm of rain against 390 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Tropical Fritillary?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tropical Fritillary sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuc Phuong National Park the best place to see a Tropical Fritillary?
2nd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Tropical Fritillary sightings, Cuc Phuong National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%).
Which relatives of the Tropical Fritillary live in Cuc Phuong National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Tropical Fritillary that you can see in Cuc Phuong National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Little Mapwing (about 50%), Himalayan Jester (about 50%) and Marbled Map (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tropical Fritillary sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tropical Fritillary is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuc Phuong National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.