What are the chances of seeing a Magnificent Swallowtail in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Magnificent Swallowtail sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 60th most-seen of the 431 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Magnificent Swallowtail in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Magnificent Swallowtail in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–August and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Magnificent Swallowtail?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Magnificent Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Magnificent Swallowtail?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Magnificent Swallowtail sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Magnificent Swallowtail live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Magnificent Swallowtail that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Western Giant Swallowtail (about 20%), Palamedes Swallowtail (about 20%) and Three-Tailed Tiger Swallowtail (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Magnificent Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Magnificent Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.