What are the chances of seeing a Thrush-like Antpitta in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thrush-like Antpitta sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 284th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thrush-like Antpitta in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thrush-like Antpitta in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thrush-like Antpitta?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thrush-like Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Thrush-like Antpitta?
6th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Thrush-like Antpitta sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Manu National Park (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Thrush-like Antpitta live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Thrush-like Antpitta that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Yellow-rumped Cacique (about 70%), Red-capped Cardinal (about 60%) and Russet-backed Oropendola (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thrush-like Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thrush-like Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.