What are the chances of seeing a Lysimnia Tigerwing in Iguaçu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lysimnia Tigerwing sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 144th most-seen of the 279 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lysimnia Tigerwing in Iguaçu National Park?
May and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lysimnia Tigerwing in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, June and September–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lysimnia Tigerwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lysimnia Tigerwing sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguaçu National Park the best place to see a Lysimnia Tigerwing?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Lysimnia Tigerwing sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lysimnia Tigerwing live in Iguaçu National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Lysimnia Tigerwing that you can see in Iguaçu National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Agathina Emperor (about 70%), Hydaspes Eighty-Eight (about 50%) and Orange Mapwing (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lysimnia Tigerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lysimnia Tigerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguaçu National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.