What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Tattler in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler sighting in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 197th most-seen of the 237 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Tattler in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Tattler in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Tattler?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Tattler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Wandering Tattler?
11th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Wandering Tattler sightings, El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Isla del Coco National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Galápagos Islands (Ecuador, about 40%) and Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Tattler live in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Wandering Tattler that you can see in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Willet (about 50%), Greater Yellowlegs (about 40%) and Lesser Yellowlegs (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Tattler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Tattler is recorded against all the birds logged in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.