What are the chances of seeing a Great Dusky Swift in Emas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Great Dusky Swift sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 179th most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Great Dusky Swift in Emas National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Great Dusky Swift in Emas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and May–October, the lowest months. That is one of Emas National Park's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain against almost none in July. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Great Dusky Swift?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Great Dusky Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Great Dusky Swift?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Great Dusky Swift sightings, Emas National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 40%), Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 40%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Great Dusky Swift live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Great Dusky Swift that you can see in Emas National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are Fork-tailed Palm-Swift (about 40%) and Sick's Swift (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Great Dusky Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Great Dusky Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.