What are the chances of seeing a Two-Tailed Pasha in Etosha National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Two-Tailed Pasha sighting in Etosha National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 21 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Two-Tailed Pasha in Etosha National Park?
May, July–August and December–January
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Two-Tailed Pasha in Etosha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Two-Tailed Pasha?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Two-Tailed Pasha sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Etosha National Park the best place to see a Two-Tailed Pasha?
5th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Two-Tailed Pasha sightings, Etosha National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 40%), Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 30%) and Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Two-Tailed Pasha live in Etosha National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Two-Tailed Pasha that you can see in Etosha National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Plain Tiger Butterfly (about 20%), Guineafowl Butterfly (about 20%) and Spotted Joker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Two-Tailed Pasha sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Two-Tailed Pasha is recorded against all the insects logged in Etosha National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.