What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Grassquit in Everglades National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grassquit sighting in Everglades National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 116th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Grassquit in Everglades National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grassquit in Everglades National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Grassquit?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Everglades National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Grassquit?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Black-faced Grassquit sightings, Everglades National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 40%) and Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Grassquit live in Everglades National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Grassquit that you can see in Everglades National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Northern Cardinal (about 70%), Northern Mockingbird (about 70%) and American Crow (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Everglades National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.