What are the chances of seeing a Large Grey Babbler in Gir National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Large Grey Babbler sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 67th most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Large Grey Babbler in Gir National Park?
March–June and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Large Grey Babbler in Gir National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, the lowest month. Those are among Gir National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain a month against 330 mm in July. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Large Grey Babbler?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Large Grey Babbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Large Grey Babbler?
3rd of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Large Grey Babbler sightings, Gir National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Ranthambore National Park (India, about 40%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Large Grey Babbler live in Gir National Park?
Same genus: Turdoides
The closest relatives of the Large Grey Babbler that you can see in Gir National Park (genus Turdoides, Turdoides Babblers) are Jungle Babbler (about 60%) and Common Babbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Large Grey Babbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Large Grey Babbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.