What are the chances of seeing a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Flowerpiercer sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 333rd most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Henri Pittier National Park?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Flowerpiercer in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rusty Flowerpiercer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Rusty Flowerpiercer?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Rusty Flowerpiercer sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 4th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, under 5%) and Chingaza National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rusty Flowerpiercer live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Rusty Flowerpiercer that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Blue-gray Tanager (about 70%), Bay-headed Tanager (about 50%) and Palm Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rusty Flowerpiercer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rusty Flowerpiercer is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.