What are the chances of seeing a Dingy Skipper in Hohe Tauern National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dingy Skipper sighting in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 165 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dingy Skipper in Hohe Tauern National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Dingy Skipper in Hohe Tauern National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and August–October, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Dingy Skipper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dingy Skipper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hohe Tauern National Park the best place to see a Dingy Skipper?
6th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Dingy Skipper sightings, Hohe Tauern National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 30%), Mercantour National Park (France, about 20%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Dingy Skipper live in Hohe Tauern National Park?
Same family: Hesperiidae
The closest relatives of the Dingy Skipper that you can see in Hohe Tauern National Park (family Hesperiidae, Skippers) are Common Branded Skipper (about 30%), Far Eastern Large Skipper (about 20%) and Essex Skipper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dingy Skipper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dingy Skipper is recorded against all the insects logged in Hohe Tauern National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.