What are the chances of seeing an Amur Stonechat in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Amur Stonechat sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 360 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amur Stonechat in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Amur Stonechat in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Amur Stonechat?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amur Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see an Amur Stonechat?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Amur Stonechat sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nikko National Park (Japan, about 30%), Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 10%) and Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Amur Stonechat live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Amur Stonechat that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-rumped Shama (about 70%), Taiga Flycatcher (about 40%) and Asian Brown Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amur Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amur Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.