What are the chances of seeing a Common Earl in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Earl sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 139th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Earl in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Earl in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, July–October and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Kaeng Krachan National Park's driest months, with about 65 mm of rain against 260 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Common Earl?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Earl sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see a Common Earl?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Common Earl sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 30%) and Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Earl live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same genus: Tanaecia
The closest relatives of the Common Earl that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (genus Tanaecia) are Lavender Count (about 10%) and Plain Earl (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Earl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Earl is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.