What are the chances of seeing a Black-Headed Skimmer in Kakadu National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Headed Skimmer sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 19th most-seen of the 76 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-Headed Skimmer in Kakadu National Park?
June, August and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Headed Skimmer in Kakadu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December to April, the lowest months. Those are among Kakadu National Park's driest months, with about 40 mm of rain a month against 350 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Black-Headed Skimmer?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-Headed Skimmer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a Black-Headed Skimmer?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Black-Headed Skimmer sightings, Kakadu National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-Headed Skimmer live in Kakadu National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Black-Headed Skimmer that you can see in Kakadu National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Painted Grasshawk (about 40%), Graphic Flutterer (about 40%) and Common Glider (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-Headed Skimmer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-Headed Skimmer is recorded against all the insects logged in Kakadu National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.