What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Percher in Kakadu National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Percher sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 21st most-seen of the 76 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Percher in Kakadu National Park?
January, March and June
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Percher in Kakadu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and August–December, the lowest months. Those are among Kakadu National Park's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain a month against almost none in August.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Percher?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Percher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a Wandering Percher?
3rd of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Wandering Percher sightings, Kakadu National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 30%) and Grampians National Park (Australia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Percher live in Kakadu National Park?
Same genus: Diplacodes
The closest relatives of the Wandering Percher that you can see in Kakadu National Park (genus Diplacodes, Perchers) are Chalky Percher (about 30%) and Scarlet Percher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Percher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Percher is recorded against all the insects logged in Kakadu National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.