What are the chances of seeing a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher in Kaziranga National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 243rd most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher in Kaziranga National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 20%), Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 10%) and Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same genus: Ficedula
The closest relatives of the Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (genus Ficedula, Ficedula Flycatchers) are Taiga Flycatcher (about 30%) and Little Pied Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pygmy Blue-Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.