What are the chances of seeing a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Sok National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plume-toed Swiftlet sighting in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 213 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Sok National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plume-toed Swiftlet sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Sok National Park the best place to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet?
11th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Plume-toed Swiftlet sightings, Khao Sok National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 50%), Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 50%) and Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Plume-toed Swiftlet live in Khao Sok National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Plume-toed Swiftlet that you can see in Khao Sok National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-nest Swiftlet (about 40%), Silver-rumped Needletail (about 20%) and Asian Palm-Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plume-toed Swiftlet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plume-toed Swiftlet is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Sok National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.