What are the chances of seeing a Peacock Pansy in Khao Yai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 73rd most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Peacock Pansy in Khao Yai National Park?
March–April and December–January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–June and August–November, the lowest months. Those are among Khao Yai National Park's driest months, with about 65 mm of rain a month against 330 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Peacock Pansy?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Peacock Pansy sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see a Peacock Pansy?
9th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Peacock Pansy sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%), Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 30%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Peacock Pansy live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same genus: Junonia
The closest relatives of the Peacock Pansy that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (genus Junonia, Buckeyes & Pansies) are Lemon Pansy (about 20%), Chocolate Pansy (about 20%) and Blue Pansy (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Peacock Pansy sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Peacock Pansy is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.