What are the chances of seeing a Thick-billed Seedeater in Kibale National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Seedeater sighting in Kibale National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 337th most-seen of the 366 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thick-billed Seedeater in Kibale National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Seedeater in Kibale National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Thick-billed Seedeater?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thick-billed Seedeater sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kibale National Park the best place to see a Thick-billed Seedeater?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Thick-billed Seedeater sightings, Kibale National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 30%), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Nyungwe National Park (Rwanda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Thick-billed Seedeater live in Kibale National Park?
Same genus: Crithagra
The closest relatives of the Thick-billed Seedeater that you can see in Kibale National Park (genus Crithagra, African Seedeaters, Serins, Canaries, and Citrils) are Yellow-fronted Canary (about 20%), Brimstone Canary (about 20%) and Western Citril (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thick-billed Seedeater sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thick-billed Seedeater is recorded against all the birds logged in Kibale National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.