What are the chances of seeing a Red-collared Widowbird in Kruger National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-collared Widowbird sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 139 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 290th most-seen of the 464 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-collared Widowbird in Kruger National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-collared Widowbird in Kruger National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Red-collared Widowbird?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-collared Widowbird sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kruger National Park the best place to see a Red-collared Widowbird?
10th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Red-collared Widowbird sightings, Kruger National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 30%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Hluhluwe-Imfolozi Park (South Africa, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Red-collared Widowbird live in Kruger National Park?
Same genus: Euplectes
The closest relatives of the Red-collared Widowbird that you can see in Kruger National Park (genus Euplectes, Bishops and Widowbirds) are White-winged Widowbird (about 10%) and Red Bishop (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-collared Widowbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-collared Widowbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Kruger National Park (139 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.