What are the chances of seeing a Cyclophora obstataria in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cyclophora obstataria sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cyclophora obstataria in Lamington National Park?
February to April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cyclophora obstataria in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Cyclophora obstataria?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cyclophora obstataria sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Cyclophora obstataria?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Cyclophora obstataria sightings, Lamington National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Booderee National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cyclophora obstataria live in Lamington National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Cyclophora obstataria that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Southern Bracca (about 20%), Comostola laesaria (about 10%) and Neat Epidesmia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cyclophora obstataria sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cyclophora obstataria is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.