What are the chances of seeing a Punchinello in Manas National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Punchinello sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the most-seen of the 9 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Punchinello in Manas National Park?
February–March, May and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Punchinello in Manas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June and November, the lowest months. Those are among Manas National Park's driest months, with about 160 mm of rain a month against 1070 mm in June. July to October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Punchinello?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Punchinello sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Punchinello?
4th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Punchinello sightings, Manas National Park ranks 4th at about 40%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 60%), Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 40%) and Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Punchinello live in Manas National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Punchinello that you can see in Manas National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Chocolate Pansy (about 30%), Pale Grass Blue (about 20%) and Purple Sapphire (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Punchinello sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Punchinello is recorded against all the insects logged in Manas National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.