What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-headed Crake in Manu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-headed Crake sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 528th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-headed Crake in Manu National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-headed Crake in Manu National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-headed Crake?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-headed Crake sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-headed Crake?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Chestnut-headed Crake sightings, Manu National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, under 5%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-headed Crake live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Rallidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-headed Crake that you can see in Manu National Park (family Rallidae, Rails, Gallinules, and Coots) are American Purple Gallinule (about 20%), Gray-cowled Wood-Rail (about 20%) and Rufous-sided Crake (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-headed Crake sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-headed Crake is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.