What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 170th most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr in Manu National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May, August–September and November, the lowest months. That is one of Manu National Park's wettest months, with about 250 mm of rain against 60 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr sightings, Manu National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr that you can see in Manu National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Malachite (about 30%), Julia Heliconian (about 20%) and White Peacock (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-Spiked Ur-Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.