What are the chances of seeing a Many-scaled Anole in Marino Ballena National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Many-scaled Anole sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 10th most-seen of the 17 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Many-scaled Anole in Marino Ballena National Park?
January and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Many-scaled Anole in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Many-scaled Anole?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Many-scaled Anole sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Many-scaled Anole?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Many-scaled Anole sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 70%), Manuel Antonio National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Many-scaled Anole live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same genus: Anolis
The closest relatives of the Many-scaled Anole that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (genus Anolis, Anoles) are Border Anole (about 40%) and Charles Myers Anole (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Many-scaled Anole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Many-scaled Anole is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Marino Ballena National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.